1. 求关于电视节目的外文文献资料，最好是娱乐类节目

我处禁止上传文件，相关PDF外文文献有，没那么多，不知是否满足近几年的要求，翻译没有，翻译得靠你自己，希望能满足你的需要，能帮到你，多多给点悬赏分吧，急用的话请多选赏点分吧，这样更多的知友才会及时帮到你，我找到也是很花时间的，如果需要请直接网络 私信 或者 Hi 中留言贴出你在 网络知道的问题链接地址 及 邮箱地址

2. 请提供一些关于艺术设计的参考文献

可以看看视觉这类杂志,我们老师要求我们看的是美术史,单独推荐是三宅一生的书,很大师的

3. 求日本艺术文献资料，最好有2~3件作品做具体介绍

文学方面小林多喜二。他的蟹工船。电影名，典子女主公用脚切菜，，

4. 引用电视节目实录的话在参考文献里怎么写

视频属于电子文献，根据国标2005，格式如下：

电子文献 electronic documents

以数字方式将图､文､声､像等信息存储在磁､光､电介质上，通过计算机、网络或相关设备使用的记录有知识内容或艺术内容的文献信息资源，包括电子书刊、数据库、电子公告等。

[序号]主要责任者.电子文献题名[电子文献及载体类型标识].电子文献的出版或获得地址，发表更新日期/引用日期，其中，电子文献及载体类型标识有以下几类：

[J/OL]：网上期刊

[EB/OL]：网上电子公告

[M/CD]：光盘图书

[DB/OL]：网上数据库

[DB/MT]：磁带数据库

(4)艺术节目文献扩展阅读：

书写格式

1、参考文献标注的位置

2、参考文献标标注方法和规则

3、参考文献标标注的格式

2007年8月20日在清华大学召开的“综合性人文社会科学学术期刊编排规范研讨会”决定，2008年起开始部分刊物开始执行新的规范“综合性期刊文献引证技术规范”。该技术规范概括了文献引证的“注释”体例和“著者—出版年”体例。不再使用“参考文献”的说法。这两类文献著录或引证规范在中国影响较大，后者主要在层次较高的人文社会科学学术期刊中得到了应用。

5. 关于综艺节目外文文献

多听多练多听点英文歌曲或看些电影原声大碟，肯定有帮助的
先听，努力地听，听三四遍之后对着原文看看自己理解了多少。因为块考六级了，所以先听往年的听力资料！短时间内会有帮助！
一开始都很难，你得坚持住。不然说啥都白说了。
1、持之以恒，有一位专家曾说过，如果你连听三天的听力，结果第四天的时候因为有事，而耽搁了（没听），那么，前三天的就等于没听！！！
2、每天听力的时间不应少于半个小时，雷打不动！
3、听力包括有意的听（配套做练习），和随意的听（边听听力，边做别的，就像我们边听新闻边吃饭一样），不过后者是在熟练的掌握所听内容后才进行的。
4、听力所选择的材料一定要相应，简单的作用小，过于难的又没作用，注意根据本人的水平，和考试的水平选择恰当的材料！
5、祝成功，一定要坚持！我也要考六级了。听力的确要加强，我现在每晚九点准时收听经济之声的“英语这夜”。里边语音纯正，听起来很舒服，的确收获很大。
还有向你推荐个很好的听力网站。<a href=".putclub">.putclub</a> 我经常在上面下听力材料的。
真题还是要听的，多听才能熟悉。
能坚持才能胜利。我们共勉吧。
祝成功！
要提高英语听力不防这样:
1,尽量听纯美或纯英的口音,也试着用英语去交流.
2,多听英语磁带,并持之以恒.
3,用心听,也用口大声说.对一段英语反复听,反复读,直至脱口而出.
4,多看纯美或纯英的电影,电视节目,还有英文歌曲.
记住:练习是提高英语听力的法宝呦

6. 艺术类外文文献

Healthcare providers and patients with diabetes evaluate the efficacy of glycemic control by 2 strategies. One strategy involves self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)1 by patients, with portable meters and continuous blood glucose monitors or sensing devices. Patients use these glucose values for daily decision-making to adjust medication doses and/or modify food intake or exercise regimens. Blood glucose fluctuates widely over minutes to hours, depending on food intake, exercise, insulin, and physical and emotional stressors. Values obtained by SMBG, therefore, do not signify average glucose (AG) concentrations. When an estimate of glucose values over time is desired, cumulative results can be downloaded from the patient’s meter in the provider’s office. These data are useful for determining whether current diabetes therapies are appropriate or need adjustment. Unfortunately, a number of barriers to blood glucose monitoring that may exist in clinical practice make it difficult to obtain an adequate amount of reliable data from patient logbooks. Barriers to SMBG implementation, as identified by patients with diabetes and their healthcare teams, include not only physical, financial, cognitive, and emotional factors, but also time constraints and inconvenience (1). In addition, patient follow-through may be lacking because of inadequate ecation or communication between patient and healthcare provider regarding what information is needed and why it is necessary. For this reason, it is important that hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c) be measured regularly.
The second strategy, measurement of Hb A1c, provides a more accurate assessment of long-term glycemia than that obtained from SMBG. The concentration of Hb A1c, which consists of glucose attached to the N-terminal valine of the hemoglobin β chain, is relatively stable, given that the mean erythrocyte life span is approximately 120 days. Therefore, the Hb A1c value reflects the integrated glucose concentration over the preceding 8–12 weeks (2). Clinically, Hb A1c measurement is used to assess whether a patient’s glycemic target has been reached and maintained. It also predicts the progression of microvascular complications. Most patients, however, perceive diabetes as a disease of high sugar in the blood and fail to understand the relevance of hemoglobin. To facilitate communication with their patients, many healthcare professionals translate Hb A1c values into average plasma glucose. Tables that convert Hb A1c to AG are available in print (e.g., the Clinical Practice Recommendations published annually by the American Diabetes Association), on Web sites, in hospitals, in doctors’ offices, and frequently in the laboratory coat pockets of members of the diabetes healthcare team.
The numbers most widely used in these Hb A1c/AG conversion charts were derived from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (3). Notwithstanding a fairly large population (1441 indivials) and the merits of this trial, the study was confined to patients with type 1 diabetes and was not designed to measure AG. In this trial, capillary glucose data were collected and recorded only from quarterly 7-point glucose profiles over a mean of 6.5 years, for a mean of approximately 182 values per patient (4). Therefore, a prospective multinational study was performed to evaluate the relationship between Hb A1c and AG (5)(6). AG was assessed by a combination of SMBG and continuous glucose monitoring, with approximately 2700 glucose measurements obtained for each participant. The results of the study revealed a strong linear relationship between AG and Hb A1c (5). The study provided a linear regression equation that allows Hb A1c values to be converted to AG. No significant differences in the equation were observed among indivials for any characteristic, including age, race, sex, presence or absence of diabetes, type of diabetes, or ethnicity (5). Analogous to essentially all clinical studies, this study had some limitations, including an inherent limitation to accurately measure AG, the small sizes of ethnic groups, and the absence of children and pregnant women. Nevertheless, the study provides the most accurate means to date for converting Hb A1c to AG.
Several publications reveal that only 25%–35% of patients with diabetes know their Hb A1c values (7)(8). Although an increased Hb A1c value is a good indicator of a need to advance therapy to prevent diabetes complications, healthcare professionals may feel that making therapeutic changes is their responsibility and thus spend little time explaining the Hb A1c test to patients. Yet, it is clear that a patient’s understanding their glucose targets and actually agreeing with a therapy change are critical to long-term success (9). In simple terms, the Hb A1c concentration indicates if a change in therapy is needed, but the SMBG results determine what specific changes are most appropriate for a given patient. Although there are numerous anecdotes about communicating Hb A1c results as AG to patients, objective data are limited. Perhaps the best publication is that of a survey performed in the UK among 111 patients attending a hospital diabetes clinic (10). Patients were provided with information relating to the association between Hb A1c and AG. At the end of the approximately 7-month study, patients with poorly controlled diabetes (Hb A1c> 9%) showed a significant rection in Hb A1c values if they were unfamiliar with Hb A1cat the initiation of the study. The magnitude of the improvement in glycemic control was greatest in those patients with the most poorly controlled diabetes. These data underscore how critical it is for patients to be ecated about Hb A1c and AG, and that their understanding of these data be assessed, because AG can be a powerful tool to improve glycemic control.
Many laboratories, including several large commercial laboratories in the US, report an AG value along with the Hb A1c value. To obtain objective information regarding current reporting of AG, investigators included supplemental questions with the College of American Pathologists (CAP) GH2-A survey sent in April 2009. Of the 2997 laboratories that responded, 500 (16.7%) indicated that they report AG; however, only 202 laboratories used the correct formula to calculate AG from Hb A1c values. Although the data reflect only laboratories that participate in CAP proficiency testing, it appears that AG is fairly widely used.
In conclusion, information about the relationship between Hb A1c and estimated AG will ultimately benefit the patient’s management of diabetes. The following will facilitate this process: (a) Clinical laboratories should report an AG estimate along with Hb A1c values for those who find this information useful in guiding diabetes management; (b) it is essential that laboratories use the correct formula to calculate AG; and (c) it is important for clinical laboratorians to communicate with clinicians, diabetes ecators, and other healthcare providers to enhance the care of patients with diabetes. Enhanced communication between laboratory clinicians, healthcare providers, and patients regarding the value of Hb A1c and its relationship to estimated AG will promote positive patient outcomes, as well as enhance each indivial’s understanding and ability to manage his or her diabetes more effectively.

7. 文化艺术节目有哪些

文化艺术分类相关指标解释
1、行业、机构指标解释
文艺创作与表演：指文学、美术创造和表演艺术（如戏剧、戏曲、歌舞、舞蹈、音乐、曲艺、杂技、马戏、木偶、皮影等各种表演艺术）等活动。包括文学（含电影、电视剧剧本）、音乐、歌曲、舞蹈、戏曲、曲艺等的创作；美术（绘画、雕塑）、工艺品、书法、篆刻等的艺术创作；编导、演员的表演、创作活动；剧务、舞台美工、服装道具、灯光音响等活动；民族艺术创作；其他未列明的文艺创作、表演及辅助活动。
艺术创作机构：指有专职创作人员、独立建制的剧目创作室（组）、美术创作室（组）及各类画院等专门从事艺术创作的机构。不包括业余性质的文艺创作机构。
艺术表演团体：指由文化部门主办或实行行业管理（经文化市场行政部门审批或已申报登记并领取相关许可证），专门从事表演艺术等活动的各类专业艺术表演团体，含民间职业剧团。如话剧团、方言话剧团、滑稽剧团、儿童剧团、歌剧团、舞剧团、歌舞剧团、歌舞团、轻音乐团、乐团、合唱团、文工团、文宣队、乌兰牧骑、京剧团、昆剧团、地方戏曲剧团、曲艺团、杂技团、马戏团、木偶团、皮影团等以及由若干剧种组成的综合性专业艺术表演团体。不包括半工半艺、半农半艺的剧团。各类专业艺术表演团体，除部队系统外，均应统计。

艺术表演场馆: 指由文化部门主办或实行行业管理（经文化市场行政部门审批或已申报登记并领取相关许可证），有观众席、舞台、灯光设备，公开售票、专供文艺团体演出的文化活动场所。包括剧院（场）、音乐厅、歌剧院（场）、舞剧院（场）、话剧院(场)、戏院、马戏场、影剧院等进行文艺表演的场所。不包括电影院、礼堂、体育场馆、美术馆及绘画、雕塑等艺术馆。附属于文化部门机构内非独立核算的剧场、排演场，公开营业的也应单独统计。
图书馆：指各类图书馆的管理与服务（对文献和信息的搜集、整理、存储、利用和管理，向社会公众开放并提供科学、文化等各种知识普及教育）。包括公共图书馆和各类机构内部举办的或单独举办的图书馆的管理与服务。不包括部队系统以及文化馆（文化中心、群众艺术馆）、文化站内设的图书室。
公共图书馆：指文化部门主办的面向社会服务的图书馆。
其他部门图书馆：是指除文化部门主办的公共图书馆以外的图书馆机构，如教育、科研、厂矿企业等举办的图书馆。
群众文化活动：指开展群众文化活动的场所的管理和组织活动。包括文化馆（含综合性文化中心、群众艺术馆）、文化站、文化宫、少年宫、妇儿活动中心、青少年活动中心、老年活动中心等群众文化活动。
其他文化艺术：指不属于以上分类的文化部门内其他从事文化艺术的事业机构和其他的各类文化艺术企业机构。
博物馆：指为了研究、教育、欣赏的目的，收藏、保护、展示人类活动和自然环境的见证物，向公众开放，非营利性、永久性社会服务机构，包括以博物馆（院）、纪念馆（舍）、美术（艺术）馆、科技馆、陈列馆等专有名称开展活动的单位。
2、从业人员指标解释
指在各级国家机关、政党机关、社会团体及企业、事业单位中工作，并取得劳动报酬的全部人员。包括：在岗职工(包括临时工、外来劳动力)、再就业的离退休人员、民办教师以及在各单位中工作的外方人员和港澳台方人员、兼职人员、借用的外单位人员和第二职业者。不包括离开本单位仍保留劳动关系的职工。

8. 请介绍几本研究韩国综艺节目的书籍、文献

这种东西别说是书.就连分析的文章都很少.
这个你恐怕去专门的综艺网站会有比专较多的人给你意见.你可以写出第一属篇专门的文章.
韩国综艺节目与其他国家的相比.自成一体.比如韩国综艺更注重娱乐性.比如说到艺能.身体搞笑.都是直接说出来.也就是明告诉观众那刚跌倒的艺人是在身体搞笑.观众却仍然喜欢看.而综艺里最主要的是为明星增加知名度.人气.让观众更了解明星.以配合本国的造星文化.个人技更是必不可少.日本和韩国对个人技的表现比较多些.欧美则是完全没有.
韩国综艺主要是由作家.这里有一位甚至十几位作家共同推进节目的进程.却又留下了不少让偶像们发挥的空间.这里面MC是非常关键.看下在石的节目你就知道了.路过闪人.

9. 艺术文献

1，首先可以到期刊网检索一下，看过去有没有关于这方面的文章，如果有雷同的最好另选题，如果有相近的可以参考一下；
2，关于平面设计方面的理论研究主要要查看外文资料，据我所知国内这方面的理论文献研究还不是很成熟，可以了解包括德国包豪斯以及西方现代设计理论。
3，实际上关键的难度在于在设计与民族艺术的关系上找到一个契合点，我国的民族艺术非常丰富，这方面的研究也很全面庞大，所以从哪里入手非常关键。